2010 cadillac srx drivers#
2010 cadillac srx windows#

Here, like in other GM cars that use it, the 3.0-liter lacks the power to propel you with much authority. Alas, I’m less enthralled with this sibling. Displacing 3.0 liters, it’s in the same direct-injection family as the 3.6-liter V-6 that adeptly moves several GM products, from the Cadillac CTS to the Chevy Camaro. Others have 2WD standard.ĭon’t let its 265-horsepower rating fool you: The base V-6 left me wanting. That’s down 8.3 cubic feet versus last year, but it’s competitive for this price range. The seats fold down for 61.2 cubic feet of maximum cargo volume. The backseat has adequate headroom and legroom, but I found the bottom cushions to be on the short side the seat sat too low for my 5-foot-11-inch frame to get adequate thigh support.

2010 cadillac srx windows#

However, some may find that the SRX’s low roofline hurts the view through the windshield, and a combination of factors - narrowing back-door windows, tiny rear-quarter windows and large C-pillars - make for a hefty blind spot.

2010 cadillac srx drivers#

The front seats are supportive and comfortable, with good adjustment range for drivers of varying sizes. Genuine wood trim and upholstery-stitched dashboard panels add an upscale touch, but the frosted silver plastic around the steering wheel and center controls drag the quality down - especially when a number of competitors gird their cabins with real aluminum. I’m less enthusiastic about the cabin materials. It’s a user-friendly setup, with decent graphics, a touch-screen interface and plenty of shortcut buttons. Get the optional navigation system, and it rises out of the dashboard, using theatrics similar to those of the CTS nav screen. The controls have decent quality, and the gauges offer a quick read, aided by an LCD screen that displays digital mph or other information. Like the second-generation CTS that introduced this era of Cadillac interiors, the SRX’s cabin is logically arrayed and a handsome bit of work. Gone are options like a third-row seat and a V-8 engine, moving the SRX out of the territory occupied by the BMW X5 and Volvo XC90. It’s slightly wider than before, but it’s length drops 4.7 inches and it’s 2.1 inches shorter. In an industry where redesigns typically add weight and size, Cadillac made the new SRX significantly smaller. The new SRX shares the current, second-generation Cadillac CTS sedan’s windswept style and friendlier face, just as the outgoing SRX emulated the sharp creases and upright angles of the first-generation CTS. We tested an all-wheel-drive, 3.0-liter SRX Performance. A normally aspirated 3.0-liter V-6 is standard, with a turbocharged 2.8-liter V-6 available next year in all-wheel-drive Performance and Premium editions. All-wheel drive is optional on all but the base trim. These days, I’m not sure that cuts it.Ī five-seater, the SRX is available with front-wheel drive in base, Luxury, Performance and Premium trim levels click here to compare it with the 2009 SRX. In a lot of ways in which competitors go the distance, however, Cadillac merely makes the grade. The SRX is certainly worth a look, particularly if you’re partial to its styling. Smaller and less expensive than its predecessor, Cadillac’s redesigned SRX moves squarely into the entry-luxury crossover segment - a corner of the market that luxury carmakers are fast descending upon.